wayne bunce & chic mcglynn c. 2001/2002

Myself, dennis tolley, dick ingermels and wayne bunce on site at a static caravan site in Bucks, c/p and dropwire put up. dunce bunce receives a call from CWU branch secretary chic mcglynn.

dunce bunce - alright chic...blah blah blah

c mcglynn - ......

dunce bunce - ...why? whats the point chic? Yeah I did, five years ago. chic I left five fucking years ago, yeah over five... and you're calling me about it now... What's the fucking point in it chic? ...there ain't any point in the union chic ...blah blah blah...

c mcglyn - ........

dunce bunce - ....why, what do I get for it, fuck all...the union can do fuck all... nah I don't want to mate...i don't want to know, waste of fucking time, i ain't wasting my money....what'd we paying for...what do they ever do?...blah blah blah

c mcglynn - .......

dunce bunce - ...chic no, forget it, I'm not interested...the union does fuck all, what can you do? BTs my employer chic...I'll go to them I got any problems...blah blah blah...yeah alright mate, see ya....

dunce bunce then commenced to tell ingermels, tolly and me that chic mcgylnn was asking him why he'd dropped his branch membership and if he wanted to rejoin?. dunce then commenced to brag that he'd been outside the cwu for over five years i.e. since the mid ninties, and mcglynn had only now realised that and was trying to persuade him to rejoin.

IMPORTANT - c. 2002 to 2004 BNP racist BT employee dunce bunce - never lost an opportunity to deride and ridicule trade unionism, collective bargaining etc etc within BT, making his opposition to and his contempt for workplace trade union representatives clear and plain. bunce often voiced his contempt for the role BT trade union representatives and officials carried out. Many BT employees including - tony bromwhich, dominic martello, andrew poozicka, howard(judy) chalmers, steve williams, tony williams, John Ivey, Jason Jennings and many many other BT employees can confirm that fact.

After hanging up on chic mcglynn, dunce bunce enjoyed himself ridiculing chic mcglynn and other cwu reps within the cwu oxbucks branch.

THAT IS UNTIL APRIL 2004, WHEN BNP dunce bunce SUDDENLY WANTED DESPERATELY TO REJOIN THE CWU. AN ORGANISATION HE IS TOTALLY CONTEMPTUOUS OF. AND LOW AND BEHOLD CHIC MCGLYNN ACCOMPANIED BY GEORGE GALLAGHER - CAME TO BTs AYLESBURY YARD HP19 8BP IN APRIL 2004 TO SIGN UP BOTH THE TRADE UNION HATING RACIST BT EMPLOYEE WAYNE BUNCE AND BUNCE'S MATE - A BULLYING, SICK, UNION HATING GOB SHITE ALCHY COWARD BY THE NAME OF ANDREW POOZICKA,

WHY DID UNION HATING RACIST WAYNE DUNCE BUNCE REJOIN THE CWU?

2Bcontd...

BUT I GUARANTEE YOU, YOU WILL LAUGH YOUR NUTS OFF AT THE REASON FOR dunce bunce's SUDDEN CHANGE OF HEART ABOUT CWU MEMBERSHIP.

n.b. IT WAS AT THIS TIME - APRIL/MAY 2004 THAT BNP BUNCE FUCKED OFF FOR A HOLIDAY WITH THAT PART OF HIS FAMILY(A RACIST RED NECK COUSIN) WHO LIVES IN THE "DEEP SOUTH" RACIST PART OF THE USA. ON HIS RETURN - (WHICH WAS JUST IN TIME TO BE TRANSFERRED TO BT MANAGER(HA) TWAT CALLED BOB READER- COLINDALE LONDON TEAM-MAY 2004) - RACIST DUNCE NEVER SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT THAT POXY HOLIDAY FOR OVER A YEAR. EVEN HIS SICK STUPID SIDEKICK POOZICKA GOT SICK OF DUNCE ALWAYS BRINGING UP THE TOPIC OF HIS AMERICAN HOLIDAY WITH HIS SICK RACIST COUSIN. but that's a whole other blog post!

 

Part 1. BT Contenious Lawyer vs ex BT employee /CWU CC&TV member Colin Jarvis.

I first became aware of this professional lawyer's existence in Oct. 2011, when I received BT's ET3. Following which, up until August 2012, a substantial quantity of electronic and hard copy documents passed between that BT Group legal representative, myself and the Reading Employment Tribunal.

CMD - 3 Feb. 2012. I deliberately arrived at Reading early in order to continue CMD prep before going in to face the Employment Judge before whom I and BT's lawyer had been ordered to appear. When time came to appear before the Employment Judge hearing the CMD - [[the first of seven instances of me appearing before Reading Employment Tribunal Judges. i.e the CMDs, PHRs and Hearing I was the Claimant party to]] - a Secretary to the Tribunal came in and said: Please follow me Mr Jarvis... Behind me I saw the person whom I presumed was the legal representative for both the First Respondent BT Group, and legal representative for the Other (five BT employee) Respondents to my Claim, accompanied by her paralegal. I asked the Secretary to the Tribunal whether that was the Respondent's lawyer?  She relied ...yes. I turned and said, hello and was responded to in kind. Shortly after which the CMD began and battle was joined. 

I was, admittedly, feeling decidedly queasy as I looked at Employment Judge Salter, looked at BTs lawyer and put the question to myself: ...Do you actually know what and who you are taking on Colin and how very unhappy you are making BT & Co. and how fucked off with you BT's white management is? And all because white people in positions of authority and decision making power within BT Group are prepared to do anything and everything it takes - within the confines of BT's in private / confidential / in strictest confidence (bullshit) internal procedures - in order to protect, to defend, to safeguard and to look after: white racist cowards employees / white bullying cowards employees / white harassing cowards employees, lying, dishonest cowards white employees & likewise do anything and everything necessary to protect, to defend, to safeguard and to look after their BT Uncle Tom black person employees? Whilst the likes of the "brave souls" i.e. frightened, fearful, duplicitous hypocrites cowards - those white people, so-called professional(HA!) TU officials inside CWU Wimbledon & those CWU-CC&TV BT employees see no evil hear no evil and do their evil and so show themselves for the type of persons they in truth and in reality are! i.e. manipulated, compliant white BT employees and duplicitous, hypocrites white CWU Wimbledon management< as in B Hayes, S Sapper and Co. 

[ As demonstrated by BT Group's total resistance to your claim and BT Group's white management's eager and willing help and assistance freely given to the five white BT employee Other Respondents by affording those five white BT employees legal advise and representation to resist the individual claims I had served on each white BT employee separately. ]

The answer came back immediately - Yes. I am fully justified is attempting to fight BT's white management and to fight my adversary in the form of the the professional lawyer sent by BT Group to defeat me, to silence me. Now speak up for yourself!

FYI - A substantial joint CMD agenda document formed the basis of the case management discussion. The Employment Judge was being asked to determine whether or not the Claimant's case should be heard before Reading ET in July 2012 as described within Tribunal Orders of 4. Nov. 2011 sent to the parties to my claim. 

Throughout the CMD the Claimant argued that, yes, my claim should be allowed to proceed to full hearing and that all of my evidence was admissible and should be heard. 

BT's lawyer argued to the contrary. That the First Respondent - BT Group apply to the Tribunal to strike out the BME BT employee's claim in whole, and if not in whole, then in substantial part.

About an hour and a quarter later, muttering a respectful ...Thank you sir... I put my documents in my briefcase i.e. a shopping bag, and followed BT's lawyer and paralegal out the room and down the corridor. I turned off to get into the lift to leave the building. When I spied my face in the escalator's mirror I noticed that I was wearing a bloody great big broad grin, on me mush. I laughed....*

BT lawyer? BT Legal? who's scared of them? Not I said the honest, decent, truthful and trustworthy black man who is Colin Jarvis. How so? Because I am scared of, frightened of and go in fear of no man and/or no entity. (innit John(Coffey) - you Uncle Tom Prick black person BNP sphincter licking cowardly twat, you!)

I laughed...*...nothing like counting your chickens... is there! (Discounting, for the moment July 2012) ...with reference to that 3/2/12 CMD and my subsequent 6-10 /8/12 ET claim hearing, you can be 100% certain that I was not wearing a self satisfied smile on my boat race when I got into the lift on the particular afternoon of the 7/8/12.

On the contrary on that 7/8/12 afternoon, man, was I irate or what!

I was completely furious with myself, so irate and so gutted and disappointed in myself that I could not think straight. 
The reason? I had allowed myself to get well and truly duffed up - good and proper by BT's Contentious lawyer and I was also given another good going over by the female Employment Judge hearing my claim, at one and the same time as that BT lawyer was beating me up at Tribunal. The win, the victory? She made an application for the claim to be halted and heard no further, I objected and argued BT's application be refused. The  Respondent sympathetic Claimant hostile Employment Judge fucked me over and sided with BT's lawyer and I witnessed my pray escape without being compelled to squeak out from their facial sphincters the verbal diaherre that was their witness statement evidence, their stupid, wholly mendacious, fabricated, risible and so so childish "evidence.....   2Bcontd...

Take it from me on 7 Aug. 2012 BTs lawyer done the business for her employer and (categorically no sour grapes intended) both BTs lawyer and the other BT employees Respondents got lucky- for want of a better expression - got very lucky in more ways than one - with the allocation of the 'Respondent sympathetic / Respondent empathetic' / Claimant hostile Employment Judge before whom my claim was heard.

Fact: There was NO WAY that BT Group via that BT lawyer nor that Employment Judge was EVER going to permit this black man to place those five - guilty as sin - sad, wholly dishonest, demeaningly pathetic, gang - mentality cowardly white BT employees under oath and then permit the black BT employee who was the self representing Claimant to question and cross examine those five white BT employees cowards whom I had single-handed FORCE MARCHED into that Tribunal Courtroom. No way in the world.

Take my word for this fact - Not one of those five workplace and/or trade union place dishonest bullying lying workplace cowards EVER thought that I would succeed in compelling them to sit in that Tribunal Courtroom. Well they were, emphatically, proved wrong!

AND what a pitiful, pathetic, sad, stupid, sheepish, vacuous, dishonest, lying workplace/trade union place bunch(bunce) of workplace racists, workplace cowards, workplace bullies and  workplace liars - those five white BT employees and their equally cowardly vacuous accompanying BT Friend- manager(HA!) whom they had brought along to Tribunal for his scum, lying, cowardly support and backing. What a sad sorry sick pathetic incestuous sight that group six white BT Openreach employees appeared to me, as I stood and watched them as they slunk past me into the Tribunal Courtroom, eyes averted. 

I, BT, the CWU and the Tribunal in reality and in fact all KNEW and/or all KNOW the above sentiments to be true, factual and accurate!

Anyway I digress. My 19&27 July / 6&7 August / 5&26 Sept. 2012 battles at Reading with BT & CWU lawyers and Employment Judges are not for this particular post.

Speaking of which...re my 3 Feb 2012 CMD judgement?

I beat 'em I defeated BTs lawyer. Hands down. 
I will publish/attach the Employment Judge Salter's CMD judgement ordering my claim to proceed to full hearing on this blog post at a later time.

Re: 3/2/12 - I had asked a senior BME CWU member - who sits on the CWUs NEC & the CWUs RAC - to please come to the 3 Feb.2012 CMD with me to help, support and accompany me. I didn't hear a thing back from him. I had also asked my CWU CC&TV branch officers for accompanying support at my 3 Feb's CMD, again silence.

So I went into battle alone, against one of BT Group's in house professional lawyers, who were fully case prepared and well versed in adversarial legal combat. BT and me doing battle in front of an Employment Judge who was professional, dispassionate, impartial, evenhanded, objective and fair minded. Unlike the Employment Judge whom my 6/7 Aug. 2012 claim was heard. I won the CMD!

FYI - BT Group's legal representative made a total of four separate applications to strike out my claim to various Employment Judge's, I made four separate objections. BT lost all four, I won all four. (2Bcont...) 

Yep, at that Feb. 2012 CMD I was abandoned*... - by utter hypocrites, completely disingenuous and yes - the cowardly, unprincipled and frightened / fearful CWU trade union organisation and the members - BME and none BME members - therein. ...*I went into battle single handed against the disgracefully hypocritical and completely disingenuous and yes - cowardly, unprincipled and frightened / fearful FTSE 100 white management of BT Group Plc at that CMD and won the argument to proceed to full case hearing of my claim against BTs management and five white BT employees.

Reference the employer BT Group and the CWU trade union* in respect of the proscribed and prohibited conduct and actions of workplace/trade union place white lying, dishonest, racist cowards, workplace/trade union place lying, dishonest bullying cowards and workplace/trade union place lying, dishonest, harassing gang mentality cowards, workplace/trade union place Uncle Tom black persons, et al. *The facts of life is this. In the end it will ALWAYS come down to - BT & CWU - WHITE PEOPLE PROTECTING WHITE PEOPLE PROTECTING WHITE PEOPLE.

WHILST BT & CWU BME EMPLOYEES / MEMBERS WHO ARE NOT UNCLE TOMS NEVERTHELESS KEEP THEIR HEADS DOWN, KEEP OUT OF HARMS WAY - WAITING FOR THE DUST TO SETTLE, WAITING FOR THE DANGER TO PASS, WAITING FOR THE RISK TO DISAPPEAR, WAITING FOR THE DANGER TO BE NONE EXISTENT. AND THEN WHEN THE COAST IS CLEAR, THOSE SAME BT/CWU BME EMPLOYEES / MEMBERS COME OUT OF HIDING / BREAK COVER, TO FEED - LIKE PARASITIC LEACHES - ON THE BENEFIT OF A BLACK MAN'S SINGLE HANDED, FEARLESS AND PRINCIPLED ENDEAVOURS AGAINST THOSE CORPORATE WHITE PEOPLE PROTECTING WHITE PEOPLE PROTECTING WHITE PEOPLE COWARDLY DISINGENUOUS HYPOCRITES.

SOME [BT & CWU] BLACK PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT UNCLE TOMS WOULD DO WELL TO TAKE A GOOD, HARD, HONEST LOOK AT THEMSELVES IN THE MIRROR. SOME [BT & CWU] BLACK PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT UNCLE TOMS NEED  TO TAKE A GOOD, HARD, HONEST LOOK AT THEMSELVES IN THE MIRROR. p.s. FOR BT/CWU UNCLE TOM BLACK PERSON PRICK HIS FATE AND DESTINY POST 11/7/13 IS NOT IN HIS HANDS. 

Personally speaking, I have absolute no difficulties about my dignity and my self respect as a black man when I put my head on my pillow at night. I am knowledgeable about many and numerous supposedly, so called good and decent people, but, sadly fearful and self delusional people - black people and white people - for whom laying their head on their own pillow at night with a clear conscience and with their dignity and self respect in tact - is a bloody impossibility. Both I and they KNOW of whom I speak and to whom I refer. Of that I have no doubt!

Anyway...re: 3 Feb.2012 CMD - I beat 'em !
The judgement handed down on the 3 Feb. to be posted on my blogs and social media websites, when I get around to it.

2Bcontd....

Labi Siffre - something inside so strong

CWU Central Counties & Thames Valley Branch

10 Jan.2013 CWU CC&TV Branch has laid formal charges against Colin Jarvis...

I cannot help but notice that the then CWU's Combined Central Counties Branch DID NOT choose to lay formal charges against a trade union hating lying workplace racist coward BT employee and CWU-CCC member wayne m. bunce, when I, in April 2006, I attempted to lay formal charges with the CWU's NDC against that same lying workplace bullying racist coward & trade union hating BT employee wayne m. bunce.

The CWU's NDC finally notifying the trade union hating lying workplace racist coward BT employee and CWU-CCC member wayne m. bunce, in late Nov. 2006, as to the formal charge laid against him by a BME CWU-CCC member. The NDC furnished the trade union hating lying workplace racist coward BT employee and CWU-CCC member wayne m. bunce, with the evidencial bundle provided by the charging CWU-CCC BME member and summoning the trade union hating lying workplace racist coward BT employee and CWU-CCC member wayne m. bunce, to a NDC hearing on 1 Dec. 2006. Whereupon the bullying lying workplace racist coward BT employee and CWU-CCC member wayne bunce immediately told the CWU's NDC what they could do with their summons and resigned his membership of the CWU with immediate effect. 

Whereupon the CWU's NDCs officer John Baldwin - in turn, in effect, told me, the charging CWU-CCC BME member Colin Jarvis - what I could do with my formal charge laid, some eight months previously, with the CWU's NDC against the trade union hating lying BT workplace bullying lying workplace racist coward BT employee and (former)CWU-CCC member wayne m. bunce,

Please note: The trade union hating BT employee workplace lying racist bullying coward and CWU-CCC member BNP racist wayne m. bunce was represented, advised and accompanied by CWU Luton Branch Secretary John Grey on - 21 Dec. 2005 when he, BNP racist w bunce, appeared before BTs FS1GC investigating manager Colin Wood and Accenture HR Specialist Steve Lawson.

Trade union hating BT employee and CWU-CCC member BNP lying workplace racist coward wayne m. bunce was again represented advised and accompanied by CWU Luton Branch Secretary John Grey on 10 Jan. 2006 when BTs FS1GC investigating manager Colin Wood brought dunce racist coward bunce before him in order to suspend him from BTs workplace.

Trade union hating BT employee and CWU-CCC member BNP lying workplace bullying racist coward wayne m. bunce was again represented, advised and accompanied by CWU Luton Branch Secretary John Grey on 7 April 2006 when BTs FS1GC deciding manager Garry Lawrence - brought BT employee and CWU-CCC member BNP lying workplace bullying racist coward wayne m. bunce before him to tell the BNP racist coward that his job is safe with BT and to be more careful in future when he spreads his ignorant backward sick and stupid BNP racist filth within BTs workplace. "...Now have a couple of weeks annual leave holiday wayne, and come back to work rested and refreshed...okay. Don't you agree John...?"(sic)

An aside - Dominic Martello called me on that Fridat night and "informed"(sic) me as to what he had witnessed that afternoon - ...Colin, fucking hell gumba, guess what, I saw that racist cunt buncey this afternoon... the yard was fucking deserted, fucking oliver had a fucking heart attack when he saw me...what you doing here..etc etc.

Martello's unexpected / unanticipated presence was to the great surprise and annoyance of BT volume manager paul olive - who, apparently, was supposed to make certain that no BT operatives were presnt in the HP19 8BP Griffin Ln yard that afternoon when BNP racist dunce bunce, his CWU-CCC Rep John Grey and BT manager Garry Lawrence were there to dish out bunce's final written warning and welcome the lying cowardly bullying BNP racist twat back to BTs workplace.

So - the CWU CC&TV branch has laid formal charges against Colin Jarvis have they? I will answer those charges when I rejoin the CWU c.2013.  I will also, at a time of my own choosing exercise my right to public protest, naming shaming and identifying BME and none BME CWU members for what they are, who they are and what they represent, and the CWUs filthy cowardly dishonest, sick cowardly hypocrisy. Just like the CWUs puppet masters BT Group Plc.

In the meantime - chic mcgylnn, john grey, gordon mason, dick sermon, mark french, eamonn mclauglin and all the other - many many many good, decent and honest men and women within CC&TV branch BME and none BME members alike, should, in all decency and honesty, acknowledge this unpalable fact, Many many many BT employees and/or trade union members including the likes of: w bunce, a ruzicka, p douglas, l foulkes, p allington, d wise, a nash, a macdonald, d thorp, k benwell, d martello, b prince, d leacock, m vincent, m gordon, h chalmers, p jarret, p carnie, r spanswick, b oakley, r guy, et al... to a man, hold you all, your trade union positions, your trade union involvement, your trade union participation in total complete and utter contempt, and those same 'persons' KNOW that all of you trade union reps /officials will, to a man - come running to their aid, assistance and support, the moment those afore named BT workplace bullying, lying cowards - click their fingers at you CWU branch "officers".

It is the fact of your, CWU's officials, cowardly, two face, dishonesty and hypocricy that makes me puke. DECENT WHITE PEOPLE PROTECTING SCUM WHITE PEOPLE....WHILST... COWARDLY BLACK PEOPLE KEEP THEIR HEADS DOWN AND LOOK THE OTHER WAY, TOO CHICKEN SHIT SCARED AND UNPRINCIPLED TO DO THE RIGHT THING AND STAND UP TO WHITE WORKPLACE BULLIES, LIARS AND RACIST COWARDS, TOO UNPRINCIPLED TO STAND UP AND BE COUNTED. 

WHITE AND BLACK HYPOCRITS - ONE AND ALL.

2Bcontd....  

   

CWU's NDC: Jan. 2013

A letter of 10/01/13 from the CWU Assistant Secretary Simon Sapper to me reads ...The Central Counties & Thames Valley Branch has laid formal charges against Mr Colin Jarvis under the terms of Rule 14.  

Okay fair enough. Then Simon Sapper goes on to state  ...Copies of the correspondence from the charging branch are attached. Which is untrue, false, a lie. No such correspondence from the charging branch was attached and/or accompanied the letter of notification. All that was included were copies of Rule 14 and the Bye-laws which govern.... Both of which, incidentally appears to have undergone some significant changes during 2011 / 2012. I wonder why? I wonder if the whole CWU membership was consulted on those significant changes made to the CWU rulebook and by-law by a closed group of white senior CWU officials?

This is not, unsurprisingly, the first time that the CWU's NDC and the officials therein have made untrue, false and wholly disingenuous and dishonest submissions within correspondence to me. e.g. In letter of 30.03.2012 NDC official Simon Sapper states: ...Obviously the NDC is not a legally qualified body, so it can only bring to bear the judgement and experience of its lay membership; but again it seems to me that if a lay body has been deficient in some regard....

A full-time trade union official of many many years standing, who sits on the CWU's NEC describes himself and his NDC colleagues as and I quote ...not a legally qualified body... and implies that these full time CWU officials are ...lay members.

Somebody, please please please have a little peek at Simon Sapper's trade union official's profile on the CWU website and that of his NDC colleagues and tell me whether you, the reader, considers those full time professional union officials to be ...lay members and/or part of the CWU's lay membership ?

Still not to worry, that's par for the course for how some CWU officials choose to carry out their trade union duties and obligations in law. Not very dissimilar from a great many BT line management and BT HRBP management. That is to say - white people protecting white people protecting white people. Whilst BME members and employees keep their heads well down and hidden, to cowardly, unprincipled and frightened to do the right thing and stand up and be counted.  

When I rejoin the CWU c. 2013/14 I will, no doubt, be ordered to appear in front of the NDC on the charges laid against me by the CC&TV. As in: ...should the charged member rejoin the CWU at some stage in the future, the NDC (i.e. its lay membership, yes?) will revisit the situation at that time.

But first, I have the extremely serious matter of judicial proceedings of a criminal nature brought against me, to address. After which I will exercise my right to peaceful protest in respect of particular and specific trade union members and/or particular and specific corporation's employees. 

2Bcontd...

wayne bunce BT acting FMA c. March 2001

High Wycombe.

An example for uncle tom prince's enjoyment. 

Onsite with Graham Davis, Dick Ingermels and Andy Nash.

A carrier-pole put up in progress mid morning. BNP dunce bunce, in his capacity as acting FMA turned up onsite for no other reason than to show off and mouth off, like the racist gob shite he is. (dunce bunce was able to be a law unto himself under  BT line manager ron ryall. (ryall was of exactly the same - absolutely useless BT manager calibre as, for example: peter martin, malcolm aubrey, paul allington et al i.e. good-for-nothing.)

Across the road from the c/p put up was a large detached house which belonged to a black man who was a very recently (2001) retired BT engineer of many years standing. The man had recently had a little write up plus photo in the CWU branch magazine OBSERVER about his career in BT and wishing him well on his retirement. The man came over to talk and have a chat with us when dunce racist cunce bunce was onsite.

I asked him how he was enjoying his retirement and what was he up to now? He replied that, yes, he was enjoying himself and intended to carry on doing so. The man then went on to tell us that he was building a house on a piece of land he had bought back in Jamaica. BNP racist bunce jumped in with: "What a mud hut, you building another fucking mud hut?" Followed by that puke inducing scummy gap tooth grin (a truly disgusting sight if ever there is one) which is that racist twat's trademark whenever he chose to deploy his racist cowardly filth within BT's workplace. 

Unfortunately BNP dunce is not willing to deploy that same inbred racist trait outside of BT. For example, when I see him on my allotment plot.

Colin Jarvis - dominic martello. c. 2006

[exchange of emails on receiving CWU Employment Tribunal Rep refusal.]

 

TO:DOMINIC MARTELLO  Sunday, 29 October 2006, 20:41

Dom, I won't actually call him a cocksucker just yet, but I fear it will have to be said eventually. Listen, I'm a bit behind schedule with casework, letters to friends etc so need to ask you to delay Tony's couple of hours out with us till I get letter/card off to him okay?. Don't forget to let me have your new mobi number when you have it and also let me have your btmobi for emergencies. Thats it for now. I will await bushbaby's fucking excuses and bullshit this coming week. If the union think I am going to take the pressure off they are so fucking wrong gumba, so fucking wrong. Still all / everyone will find out soon enough how fucking aggrieved and angry I am. Then I'll sit back and watch as every fucker dives for cover.

Fuck em man, it's got to be done!!!!!!!!!!!!

I'll be in touch.

DOMINIC MARTELLO <dominic.martello@btinternet.com> wrote:

COLIN

I would like you if you get a chance to say to that prick andy fucking bushbaby that if he feels concerned enough for what ever the conversation was with his union saftey rep to mention to her that AYLESBURY IS A RACIST YARD,why does he not feel compelled to do something about it,coz if this is how he feels about aylesbury then why dont he stick with you gumba right to the end.

YOU FUCKING ASK HIM THAT AND TELL HIM FROM ME THAT HE IS A COCK SUCKER

Colin Jarvis - brian prince c. Dec. 2010

Location: in BT vehicle in S4 exchange carpark nr Dunstable - (finished manhole/pole 20pr c/o with frank - the plank- hackett. i.e. dominic martello's banker)

b prince: ...I read your article in the union mag, it's good...

Colin Jarvis:...Have they sent the mag out then? I ain't got it yet. I bet they didn't published the thing in full?

bp:... Well it's got your name on it. To be honest Colin I'm embarrassed that I believed all the things I was being told about you...

Colin Jarvis:...Like what brian?

b prince: ... (silence).

NB From first working with and alongside brian prince c. early 2008 (when external copper network Operatives first took up residence in HP19 8BP upstairs office under s wingrove and k woodward) up until Aug. 2011 b prince was always guarded and very careful about what details and specifics he was willing to reveal / state / impart to me in all conversations which I had had with him and in which he voluntarily engaged me.

The reasons* for the obvious reticence / reluctance / guardedness on the part of b prince and indeed the same 'workplace behaviour' on the part of his friend dominic martllo, (or - danger mouse, as I had christened martello much to prince's amusement - as indeed I was amused, entertained and somewhat surprised by brian prince's originality when in February 2011 in the course of a private conversation with brian prince concerning Oxford BT operatives lee foulkes and phillip douglas, b prince christened BT employee/CWU-CC&TV member phillip douglas - Phil the nigger!) and on the part of all other BT /employees whom BT's racist in residence and his followers had deliberately and wholly unjustifiably poisoned and contaminated against me - I being the black BT Operative who had totally outed and exposed BT's C1 racist in residence BNP wayne BUNCE c. Dec.2005 to June 2012. ...the reasons* will be described  in full within forthcoming blog / social media posts.

Colin Jarvis - dominic martello c. 2007

DOMINIC MARTELLO Sunday, 18 February 2007, 16:54 <dominic.martello@btinternet.com> wrote:

colin

Hope you are ok,not heard from you in a while,dont worry my friend on the beaches we fought,the trenches we did not hide,and now comes the time to prade ourselves for we are the unsung heros of this battle,

speak to you soon SIR DOMINIC WINSTON CHURCHILL MARTELLO

P.S if you ever get out reds do you remember the name of that place

Claimant's objection to BTs application to strike out my claim.

From: Colin Jarvis <colindjarvis@btinternet.com>
To: READINGET <readinget@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk>
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, 16 June 2012, 10:58
Subject: Fw: Mr C Jarvis v BT plc. (and others) - case number 2702940/2011

Dear ReadingET

I refer to the application made by the First Respondent that a PHR be listed urgently in order for the Respondent’s application to strike out my claim in its entirety be heard by the Tribunal. BT Legal stating the grounds on which that application is made. The Claimant asserts to the Tribunal the stated grounds upon which BT Legal stand is without foundation or merit. I therefore would respectfully seek the Tribunal’s leave to state the Claimant’s objection and the grounds on which that legal objection is based.

Threatening behaviour

The Claimant’s statement, which we understand he has sent to the tribunal, contains numerous personal attacks on individuals employed by the First Respondent, including but not limited to the other named Respondents. His comments are aggressive, inflammatory and extremely threatening. For example, the Claimant includes the following statement (with his own emphasis):

“You can be assured I won’t play back and I won’t kickback.

Instead of which I, me, this black man, this BME BT employee; will teach you - and your BT Friends and/or your TU Friends – a lesson that you will never forget.

I will adverselyimpact upon and affect your life. Your work life and your home life, your private life, your personal life; profoundly, irrevocably and to all intent and purpose, permanently....

I refute that totally. I have not engaged in threatening behaviour in any way in the course of my witness statement. What I have engaged in is stating the facts of the matter, as reflected in disclosed BT documents c. November 2010 to 13 June 2012. BT documents (substantial quantities) of BT In-confidence documents, BT privileged documents.The information contained therein as that relates to this BME BT employee who is the Claimant and my just, equitable and reasoned reactions / responses to becoming party to that information - as that information relates to the Claimant, relates to the other Respondents to my claim and relates to other involved / concerned individual BT employees - does not constitute threatening behaviour. I respectfully submit what that constitutes is a natural human response to being so maliciously, damagingly, dangerously and destructively presented against by other BT employees, both field team and line management, BME and none BME BT employees alike.

I have no need to use threatening behaviour. I simply have to point to that which has been presented in substantial quantities of BT documents which are attributable to other BT employees and their BT Friend(s).

The Claimant’s detailed witness statement contains very considerable references to exact pages of BT provided documents for a reason. Please note: I have lived with the contents of those BT documents since early December 2011. Just as I have lived with the BT workplace consequences of taking workplace action and Tribunal proceedings against a workplace racist coward in BT who was, and still remains, popular amongst other BT employees in this part of BT plc.. Please do not view the Respondent’s application and the grounds on which that application is made as, in any way, valid, proportionate or in any way justifiable. With respect, I worked with and alongside these men, nobody, I repeat nobody, within BT Legal has. They, unlike me, are therefore in large measure ignorant of the facts, the reality, the actuality of the what I have complained to BT about and have now succeeded in bringing before an Employment Judge and Tribunal panel. ReadingET viewing my claim as meriting hearing over five days. My employer instructing their legal representatives to resist my claim. BT also placing the full weight of their organisation’s legal expertise at the service of the five white BT employees on whom I served ET1s separately.

Is it proportionate that a legitimate listed Tribunal claim be struck out because the Respondents are irate at the fact that the contents of the Claimant’s witness statement has presented the facts of my empirical BT workplace experience and my deep knowledge, as that relates to case 2702940/2011.

Please note, I am, also, irate (as in; I have been made to feel extremely sick and unwell and continue to be so) at the contents of BT documents disclosed to this BME BT employee as a result of my instigating Tribunal proceedings against five white BT employees individually and against my employer. Irate(ness), irrespective of quoted case law relied upon by BT, is not legitimate grounds on which to base an application to withhold from a citizen of this country his right to access legal due process and considered legal judgement, in respect of my workplace rights and entitlements as a BME BT employee.

BT plc.’s obvious concern for five white BT employees to be now kept away from and safeguarded from public accountability for those BT employee’s workplace actions is confusing to the Claimant. Why should grown men not be exposed to questioning from the BME BT employee those grown men freely, happily and with malice chose to target and pick on, in a cowardly, gang mentality manner because of my race and my visible TU workplace role and activity?

Are BT afraid those grown men may somehow come to some harm?

An Employment Judge and Tribunal panel will be there to ensure that that doesn’t happen, and that the law is fairly, impartially, proportionately, equitably and justly administered. That is my, admittedly limited, understanding of Employment Tribunal proceedings.

The fact that those grown men will be obliged / compelled to either retract and withdraw their current stated evidence or perjure themselves in the public forum of an Employment Tribunal is not the Claimant’s fault or my responsibility.

The retraction of evidence in the legal arena of a Tribunal or committing perjury in the legal arena of a Tribunal is a natural consequence of the law taking its natural course, as a result of a BME BT employee upholding my workplace rights, my workplace dignity and my self respect as a BME employee and as a black man outside of my workplace. Why the First Respondent considers they have to be protective of grown men who are workplace perpetrators of cowardly gang- mentality bullying, harassing and victimisation on the grounds of another BT employee’s race and TU workplace visibility is puzzling to the Claimant. For example, the witness statements in my possession - from the five white BT employees whom the First Respondent seeks to protect from being spoken to by the BME BT employee who was those grown men erstwhile victim and target – speaks to the necessity for the listed case to be allowed to proceed without interference. The witness statements from the BT employee Respondents are not only highly offensive to the BME BT employee Claimant. The contents of those witness statements are simply, factually and actually wholly mendacious and without merit. That is it say; untrue, false, lies.

The Claimant seeks the right to put the case of those aforementioned facts to the grown men who are the five white BT employee Respondents. The grown man who is the Claimant, undertakes not to, in any way, be horrible and/or nasty to any of those other grown men who are the Other Respondents, when I put to them individually, and in front of an impartial and independent Employment Judge and Tribunal panel - the fact of their unlawful workplace conduct those grown men carried out against me in BT’s workplace simply because of the fact that I am a black BT employee and that I engaged myself in visible TU workplace activity. Therefore I assert, to grant a PHR in order to hear an application to strike out should be refused by the Tribunal.

Discriminatory behaviour

In addition, the Claimant makes a large number of racially derogatory accusations against a colleague, who is not a Respondent to the claim and will not be a witness at the hearing. The comments, reproduced below, are discriminatory and vindictive. The Claimant’s personal opinions of Mr Prince are entirely irrelevant to the allegations made in his claim and can therefore only have been included out of malice.

The Claimant does not retract a single syllable of the Claimant’s personal statement. Please see (i) BT documents contained within the First Respondent’s bundle disclosed to the Claimant in respect of the evidence given to BT IMs by the BME BT employee Brian Prince. Please also see (ii) CMD 7.4, 7.5, 7.6, 10.1 and 10.2. Please also see (iii) FS1GC documents from the Claimant.

The first set of documents contain evidence which is discriminatory and vindictive toward me, and was submitted in malice and with malice aforethought by Brian Prince. That I am afraid, and with the greatest of respect, is a simple fact. The fact that BT Legal are not in a position to concur with that fact is something over which the Claimant has no control and which I am helpless to influence. The second set of documents demonstrates the actions taken by the Claimant in my attempt to hold this BME BT employee accountable for the wilful and malicious harm done to me by the lies, the false, and the egregiously misleading evidence he submitted to BT IMs in August and September 2011. I failed in that attempt. The third set of documents I rely upon as a part of my claim in respect of my employer’s FS1GC and GA procedures in relation to Brian Prince. (I am deliberately not referring to Brian Prince as *****-*** Prince in the course of this objection to the assertion of discriminatory behaviour by BT Legal, out of proper respect for the legal proceedings this objection is a part of. I wish also to be respectful of ReadingET, respectful of my employer and respectful of their legal representative.

I respectfully ask my employer to acknowledge this fact. That which I presented to BT IMs at FS1GC and GA stage was presented by me with the knowledge that that evidence, written and verbal, could be subject to being revealed and disclosed to another person. The offensive utterly offensive, cowardly and wholly mendacious evidence presented verbally by that BME BT employee B Prince was submitted by Prince in the 100% certainty that what he, Prince, stated and gave into evidence to BT IMs in the privacy of BT’s internal FS1GC and GA procedures would nevern ever never ever be known by the black BT employee he, Prince, was deliberately wilfully and with malice aforethought, to all intent and purpose; destroying, when he chose to give into evidence to BT the sick, cowardly, disgusting lies, fabrications and egregiously misleading statements which he, Prince , presented at FS1GC and GA hearing investigations (sic)....*

Please do not talk to me about malice, vindictiveness, discriminatory behaviour in respect of my workplace and Brian Prince if you do not know, if you are totally and utterly unaware and without knowledge of the facts of the matter.

*....would nevern ever never ever be known by the complaining black BT employee Colin Jarvis. 

Incidentally and factually the above (sic) is fundamentally applicable to every single other BT employee involved in this whole dirty business. That fact of absolutely assured confidentiality within the employer’s internal procedures is the driving force behind all those BT employee’s conduct during the course of BT’s internal procedures. A fact upon which all the perpetrators and administrators concerned rely. i.e. The victim, the complaining BME BT employee Colin Jarvis - will never ever know! Will the reader please note the fact that no such anonymity and confidentiality exists in Tribunal proceedings. That’s why they all resist when served to appearing in front of an independent judicial body which is external to the privacy and confidentiality of their employer’s workplace.

The Claimant, in his witness statement, makes reference to the phrase ‘Uncle Tom’ 9 times in reference to a black colleague. This is a racially derogatory phrase and is undoubtedly intended to humiliate, vilify and offend. The Claimant’s conduct in presenting this discriminatory content is clearly unwarranted, unreasonable and scandalous.

The racially derogatory phrase referred to is indeed intended to humiliate, vilify and offend. Of that there is no dispute and I do not seek to hide that fact from any. The fact that I have attributed, repeatedly so, that, so loathed, attribution to a black person, in this instance BT employee Brian Prince, was the point of the Claimant’s personal statement in respect of my workplace and that particular BME BT employee whom I have worked with and/or alongside for some five years. Unfortunately (maybe that should read - fortunately?) the reader is not Colin Jarvis. Therefore I can only state the fact that what I have read of what was presented by Prince to BT IMs. Prince’s intention was, demonstrably, to humiliate me, vilify me and be offensive, highly offensive to me, but privately. That is to say, in the total privacy of an employer’s internal confidential procedures.  Do you, the reader understand, comprehend the point which I am making? If the reader does not comprehend and/or understand the point, I cannot help that. I am helpless to change reality. The content the Claimant’s personal statement is anything but discriminatory, unwarranted, unreasonable and/or scandalous. I respectfully request the Tribunal reject the Respondent’s assertions as, in part, grounds for striking out the listed claim granted to the Claimant in November 2011.

Course of conduct

The Claimant’s witness statement insults numerous individuals, a large number of whom are unrelated to the Claim that he is currently bringing. The Claimant refers to 3 previous tribunal claims brought against this employer and the First Respondent considers that this demonstrates a vexatious course of conduct designed to discredit the First Respondent and its employees. It is clear from the Claimant’s statement that his motive in bringing proceedings is to vilify, distress and personally impact the Respondents to the claim. This is a motive that is entirely vexatious. The Claimant makes further threats as follows: 
  
Do those things, choose to do those things and you may well discover for yourself that doing those things to another employee in BT’s workplace comes at a heavy price. Comes with, a whole life impacting price - previously inconceivable to you - attached to doing those things to this BME BT employee.

The fact that numbers of BT employees and/or TU member’s now realise and fully comprehend that they and their BT Friend(s) prohibited unacceptable and unlawful conduct and abhorrent behaviour, in a workplace and/or in a trade union-place context has; unwelcome consequences for those “persons” and their BT Friend(s) i.e. perpetrators of such sick, backward, bullying, harassing and targeted cowardly workplace conduct. The resulting, very serious and far reaching; unwelcome consequences for those “persons” are; their fault. (ii) their problem. (iii) their responsibility”.

The contents of the BT documents within the bundle are  insulting in the extreme to the Claimant. Insulting, highly offensive, and wholly damaging to me in my workplace. I assert BT’s bundle demonstrates the numerous individuals named have behaved in a wholly insulting manner toward me as a legitimate and valid BME BT employee, and have been wholly insulting of that small degree of intelligence which I possess. Insults, whether justified or otherwise is not justifiable grounds on which BT are, in part, seeking the wholesale termination of legal proceedings legally/lawfully brought against them and/or their employees.

The First Respondent cannot have grasped the point 1-4 in witness statement. Please note: January 2006 ET1 served following CWU recommendation and advise. After which the CWU washed their hands of this BME member. I carried that ET1 as best I was able but was struck out in November 2006. Please note: February 2007 ET1 served (2 Respondents) via a no win no fee Solicitor. That following my return to work after 12 months on sick leave.I returned to work to be subjected to affecting and affective detrimental treatment by the racist employee BT IMs had left in place following FS1GC and GA, and by his many ‘mates’ in BT South Mids patch. That ET1 was my attempt to cause that detriment to cease. It didn’t work. The affective and affecting detriment continued in one form or another up until the present time*. Please note: October 2011, hence* this current listed claim. (...You’re not working me like a nigger.....laugh laugh.... repeated) ( Yeah, its called; The Whipped Nigger....laugh laugh... repeated) ( Yeah, you’re up on the toilet door...laugh laugh)- this current ET1 encountering sustained and determined resistance from the employer BT plc who is the First Respondent. Please note: January 2012 ET1; Why are you, BT plc. giving legal representation to five white grown men on whom I have served a claim? In March 2012 that claim is withdrawn by the Claimant. That totals four ET1s. Those four ET1s, with respect, does not demonstrate a vexatious course designed to discredit my employer. What that demonstrates is expressed accurately, precisely and concisely within the Claimant’s witness statement. The fact that the First Respondent is of the view they have expressed, as a consequence of reading the Claimant’s witness statement is not grounds on which to strike out a legitimate claim. The First Respondent is entitled to hold the views expressed. That does not justify attempting to gag and silence a BME employee who is pursuing a legitimate Tribunal claim granted by ReadingET. I assert, the First Respondent’s expressed point of view is not legal justification for a PHR which seeks to have my claim struck out. Please refuse the First Respondent’s application. Please note, I have absolutely no desire whatsoever to discredit my employer. Unlike, of course, the actual individuals named and identified by me in the Claimant’s   witness statement. Those named BT employee’s workplace actions, conduct, behaviours, reactions and responses to lawful action brought by a legitimate BME BT employee, wholly discredit and undermine the First Respondent.

My motive in bringing proceeding is simple. I refuse to compromise my dignity and self respect as a BME BT employee. Regardless of whatever the First Respondent believes my motive to be. I am helpless to prevent by employer holding that opinion and that point of view.

Will my employer (and the Tribunal) please note. Your employees, BME and none BME, have vilified me, distressed me and personally impacted on my life to a not inconsiderable degree. [Please excuse that understatement. I am somewhat irate at being obliged to submit a legal objection to being called vexatious for determining to hold onto my dignity and self respect against numbers of workplace cowards and their BT Friend(s) and mates.]

  
Course of conduct Re: It is clear from the Claimant’s statement that his motive in bringing proceedings is to vilify, distress and personally impact the Respondents to the claim. This is a motive that is entirely vexatious ...(sic) 

Is, therefore, the First Respondent’s implication by the above (sic) that the Tribunal should "feel sorry for", "feel sympathy for" these grown men in an employer’s -BT's -  workplace and so let them off  attending a legitimate listed Tribunal hearing?  Purely because of the factual and demonstrably true (reference BT documents) contents of the Claimant’s witness statement in respect of those , supposedly, fully grown, responsible adults  -who work for BT?

Please refuse the Respondent’s outrageous application which seek to, in effect, impede the full and proper administration of Employment Law against Respondents on whom I had individually served ET1s in September 2011.

The Claimant makes further threats as follows:....

I, and with respect, repeat. I have not made any threats whatsoever to anybody within my witness statement. I cannot be held responsible for the Respondent’s interpretation of their reading of the Claimant’s witness statement. An Employment Tribunal is by necessity... (i.e. justice been seen to be done, demands it be so) ..is a public forum. The fact that some many BT employees consider BT’s workplace to be their personal private environment and a place where they are perfectly entitled to be none-compliant of those workplace laws they disagree with as not being applicable to them, is not grounds on which to shield those grown men from Tribunal accountability and responsibility. Which is what the Respondent’s application seeks to achieve.

Fair trial no longer possible....

I respectfully ask the reader to please note: Those matters which I cannot, which I am unable to bring before my employer. e.g. c. March 2011: an unidentifiable liquid (possibly urine) poured onto the door handle of my private vehicle parked at Aylesbury TEC. (photograph taken). c. March 2011: a bag full of copper coins posted through my front door. (Thames Valley Police URN 378.(01/04/2011)- Give us a name/names please Colin! I can’t, I didn’t see them do it) e.g. c. April 2011: Drawing pins through eyes, bloody noses, faces scared/marked on photo ID’ed workplace posted notices (Thames Valley Police.-Give us a name/names please Colin! I can’t I didn’t see them do it) e.g c.June 2011: “Murder Please” notice posted adjacent to my photo ID’ed notice at Aylesbury Stores Hub. (Thames Valley Police URN 1496(07/06/2011)- Give us a name/names please Colin! I can’t, I didn’t see them do it).

Fair trial no longer possible....

The Respondents are concerned that, if the Claimant’s claim is allowed to continue, he will use the proceedings and the hearing itself to continue these personal attacks and this aggressive and threatening behaviour. We assert that a fair trial is no longer possible in light of the Claimant’s express threat that he will permanently and profoundly impact the personal lives of those involved in the claim. The Claimant has named five Respondents, all of whom wish to give evidence in order to defend their position in this case. As a direct result of the threats contained in the Claimant’s witness statement those Respondents will no longer be able to give that evidence without fear of the consequences. The Respondents rely on Force One Utilities Ltd v Hatfield UKEAT/0048/08in support of the contention that the Claimant’s intimidating conduct ought to lead to a strike out  

Please do not talk to me about what is and what is no longer possible in respect of “fairness”. It just causes me to become irate with my employer. Please do not talk to me about personal attacks inside of or outside of my employer’s workplace. It causes me to become irate with my employer. Please do not talk to me about aggressive threatening behaviour. It causes me to become irate with my employer Please do not talk to me about fear of the consequences. It causes me to become irate with my employer. Please do not talk to me about expressed threats. It causes me to become irate with my employer.

I assert to the Tribunal, please do not grant the Respondent’s application. Please refuse that application for PRH to strike out and instead please order the Respondents to proceed to attend the listed claim at Tribunal wherein they are named Respondents.

Strike out a proportionate response

...Allowing the case to continue will allow the Claimant further opportunity to vilify and threaten those involved in his claim. The Respondents assert, in accordance with Rule 11(3) that a strike out will ensure that the Claim is dealt with expeditiously and fairly and that the Respondents are not required to attend and subject themselves to the Claimant’s scandalous, unreasonable and vexatious conduct.

People in BT’s workplace who vilify, threaten, harass, bully and intimidate another person at work simply because of that person’s race and because that person has chosen to do a visible TU workplace activity and because that person chooses to formally holds BT employees accountable within a workplace context, is not being opportunistic. Providing to the Other Respondents a comprehensive and detailed witness statement the Claimant wishes to place before an Employment Judge and Tribunal panel is not being opportunistic nor vilifying, neither is it threatening or anything of the sort. What it is, is a BME BT employee properly and with serious and appropriate appreciation of the facts, and with thought and application, using my lawful workplace rights to uphold, defend and safeguard my workplace dignity and self respect as a BME BT employee inside of and outside of BT’s workplace.

Sir / Madam I respectfully assert to ReadingET; for the First Respondent to apply for a strike out and that the Respondents be not required to attend Tribunal because they would be subject to cross examination as hostile by the BME BT employee who was those person’s erstwhile victim and target in the First Respondent’s workplace is itself: scandalous, unreasonable and vexatious conduct on the part of the Respondents, and as such should not be entertained by the Tribunal. But rather the Respondent’s application be refused and the Respondent’s ordered to comply with Tribunal orders and directions as currently exists.

Respectfully I contend to the Tribunal, to grant the Respondent’s application would be unjust, wholly disproportionate and send a seriously detrimental and affecting message to every victims of workplace bullying and harassment, whether that be of a racist nature or of another protected characteristic. And conversely will send out a clear message to the perpetrators of cowardly gang mentality workplace bullying and harassment. That message will be; You can get away with it in BT, we’ve proved you can!

I assert for the Respondents to be granted a strike out application will defeat and render unachievable the overriding objective of the listed hearing of my case, and the deny the Claimant due process to achieve a considered legal judgement to my claim against BT Group and the Other Respondents. Please, therefore, do not permit the Respondent to deny me and withhold from the BME BT employee who is the Claimant those legal workplace rights in law which is every employees - none BME and BME employees alike.

I confirm by copy of this email to the Respondents that the above constitutes the Claimant’s full, just, equitable, proportionate, expeditious and proper objection to the Respondent’s application.

Your faithfully

Colin Jarvis.

BT Employees / CWU members

Every and all workplace conversations I engaged in with the following BT employees / CWU members will be reproduced verbatim within this blog.

In other words, every utterance - what was said by whom it was said and about whom it concered,- that was expressed directly to me by the named individuals, will be very accurately, very precisely and very concisely reproduced word for word within this blog, for the benefit of all persons concerned, for benefit of those person's family, friends and acquaintances.
(Oh! and also for my benefit.)

I am greatly assisted in this regard by the fact that, as all named individuals concerned well know, from their first hand experience, that I have very very good recall.
(Y'u get me !!!)

BT employees / CWU members: (in no particular order):
wayne (dunce racist cunce)bunce, brian prince, dominic martello aka - destefano, andrew ruzicka,
tony williams, geoff williams, John Ivey (friend), Jason Jennings (friend), steve wingrove, keith benwell, ray lasan, peter martin, ken woodward, philip douglas, steve halsey, lee foulkes, martin northfield, bob reader, martin lock, mathew gordon, mark vincent, dale leacock, andy bushrod, chic mcglnn, gordon mason, andrew macdonald.

The above list of names is not by any means exhaustive.  

c. Jan. / Feb. 2006.

Jan 2006. Haddenham exchange.

After the departure of a.ruzicka and t.bromwich, I and Jason Jennings had a conversation with dominic martello concerning the recent (10/01/2006) suspension from work a PEU C1- a BNP workplace racist bullying coward by the name of wayne bunce. - whom ruzicka, Jason and I worked with.

It was common knowledge that d. martello, had recently come up against a brick wall - we were given the fucking run-around by those BT manager cunts and that fucking useless union bushbaby Rep. (sic) as he-martello- had put it - when he and John Ivey - a black BT employee - had previously attempted to report racist bullying and harassment which they had both been subjected to by white BT racist cowards who worked at BT(nick)Griffin Ln.

d. martello - in the course of that conversation in Haddenhan exchange about the recent suspension of the BT racist in residence wayne m. bunce - d. martello became very agitated and loud when insisting that "..absolutely fuck all is going to happen to buncey...you fucking watch, the cunt will get away with it, you'll see..." I pointed out to dominic martello that the racist coward, the racist twat - bunce - had already been suspended, which in itself amounted to a bit more than  ...fuck all...

 

From martello's reactions during the course of the discussion, it was obvious to Jason and I that martello was extremely irate about the manner in which BT's white management had conned and tricked dominic martello and Jon Ivey when BTHR and BT Aylesbury line management had "investigated" their formal grievance complaint of racist bullying harassing by white dishonest cowards BT employees. When I was in the PEU office in the company of andy poozicKA and about to go home dominic martello-distefano called me and said he was sorry for flying off the handle about ...that cunt bunce (sic). I remember that I walked out of the office because I had spoken his name when answering his call and did not want the cunce licking walking-haemorrhoid andy ruzicKA overhearing what I said to dominic martello.   

Feb. 2006

Sat. pm. I received phone call from dominic martello who sounded very agitated and concerned for me. 

"... Colin, I was in the yard (Griffin Ln HP19 8BP) this afternoon and heard that cunt howard chalmers and those others say that dean newport-hall is going to report you for being racist, saying " Oi white boy" to him last Thursday afternoon...."

I then had a conversation with dominic martello to ascertain as much exact information as to what was being alleged and by whom - in respect of the accusation of racist harassment being leveled against me by newport-hall. newport-hall being a new BT employee and a stupid little retarded little boy and the daughter-like son of the BT(nick)Griffin Ln. garage manager.  dominic martello was very forthcoming and helpful in regard to telling me what ...those cunts in the yard are up to... - as Martello put it - and then carried on to tell me that he would report back whatever else he heard and saw from now on. dominic martello-distefano finishing the phone call with ...I'll watch your back in here Colin. They fucking did me and Jonny just like they're doing you. I said thanks Dominic I appreciate that mate. Stay in touch Dom. I then called an ex (nick)Griffin Ln. workmate Tony Williams on that same night to inform him of what dominic martello had told just informed me of. I said to Tony Williams that it looks as though the retaliation has started now that the racist BNP twat bunce has been outed and suspended by BT management.

I then emailed the CWU local branch Rep and described exactly the retaliatory conduct of some stupid, retards white BT employees at HP19 8BP  which d. martello had informed me about. 

For my own safety I then signed off work on sick leave and I did not return to work until a year later in  Feb. 2007.

Late Feb. 2006. at my invitation d. martello and Jon Ivey paid me an evening visit at my Penn Rd home where we discussed in detail the BNP racist inbred wayne bunce's suspension, BT management and their internal FS1GC procedures and the guilty and culpable BT employees involved etc. etc... at some length.

From Feb. 2006 until Feb. 2007 d. martello - voluntarily and enthusiastically - acted as my eyes and ears within BTs workplace HP19 8BP - relaying to me all the information that he was able too in respect of what was happening, was being said and by whom etc. I, in turn I fed martello all the information I was sensibly able too in respect of how I was trying to progress on-going formal stage 1 grievance complaints and grievance appeals etc. with BT management, including the actions of the CWU branch Reps involved.

Re: the below email. If the reader is that stupid that you need clarification of the obvious, here it is. The below email was SENT FROM dominic martello/distefano TO ME. 

I had and I have ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with the phrase ...SIR DOMINIC WINSTON CHURCHILL MARTELLO (sic) coming into being. That is how dominic martello referred to HIMSELF within HIS email to ME.  (geddit?)  

Just as similarly I had ABSOLUTELY nothing to do with the phrase ...Phil the nigger (sic) as in ...Who Phil the nigger? (sic) coming into being. 

n.b. As I have already stated elsewhere, I would be more than happy, I would be very glad, I would be delighted to be able to claim to be the inventor of and the first person  to have used the phrase ...Phil the nigger (sic) but I can't.  

I'd be lying if I did and I don't lie. I have no reason to lie. I don't NEED to lie. Unlike some.

Doubtful? Sceptical? Then feel free to ask: link>phil-nigger-aka-bt-employee/cwu-cc&tv member-phillip douglas. & Co.

No no no. I'm delighted... (n.b. Let me be clear: I could not give a flying fuck about any Uncle Tom black person's subsequent denials made to ATVP and/or made to his white BT(massas) colleagues (sic) ...to state that the actual 'honour' and the 'personal pleasure' (in front of only black people, naturally!) of that: ...Who Phil the nigger? (sic) claim to fame belongs entirely to the black person BT employee who spoke that phrase to me c. Feb. 2011 @ HP19 8BP :-)

i.e. An Uncle Tom Prick black person who is very 'brave' and very 'outspoken' when discussing BT workplace white racists and BT workplace white bullies when Uncle Tom Prick is in private, in other black people's company! innit, John (Coffey) bwoy! 

DOMINIC MARTELLO Sunday, 18 February 2007, 16:54 <dominic.martello@btinternet.com> wrote:

colin

Hope you are ok,not heard from you in a while,dont worry my friend on the beaches we fought,the trenches we did not hide,and now comes the time to prade ourselves for we are the unsung heros of this battle,

speak to you soon SIR DOMINIC WINSTON CHURCHILL MARTELLO

P.S if you ever get out reds do you remember the name of that place

(n.b. I have NO clue as to what is being referred to in the P.S (sic) above. The reader will have to ask dominic martello distefano for clarification on that specific.)

FYI c. 2006: A quote from d. martello.

d. martello speaking to me about one of his many many conversations with his colleague brian prince in relation to what was occurring within BT HP19 8BP as a result of my actions throughout 2006.

[quote]. "...Colin, brian(prince) said to me "...how do you know all this dominic?" [unquote]

[quote]. ..I said to him: "...I make it my business to know brian..." [unqote] 

end of blog draft.